Thursday, 26 June 2014

...

A reckoning cannot be postponed indefinitely.

49 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. Hello again, Miss Annalee.

      Delete
    2. Get out clean my ass, I should've known better. What are you doing back here?

      Delete
    3. I'm delivering a warning.

      Delete
    4. Mmm hmm, and who's it directed at?

      Delete
    5. The recipient of the last one. Who else?

      Delete
    6. You're gonna have to say that again and be more specific. I don't speak cryptic bullshit.

      Delete
    7. Yeah great. Perfect. Excuse me while I go flip a table.

      Delete
    8. Back from flipping the table. Where the hell is she?

      Delete
    9. Safe. Home. A warning is useless without chance to heed it.

      Delete
    10. So this is a preemptive response to a will be inevitable danger thing. Great. Fucking great. Well I won't pretend like I've missed her company. Oh fucking boy.

      Delete
  2. Replies
    1. A 'JN' was looking for you.

      Delete
    2. ...who? I've never heard of them, but they can always comment here if they want to find me! : D

      Delete
  3. Replies
    1. The observant one speaks. A balancing of the books.

      Delete
    2. Red ledgers. She has been too careless.

      Delete
    3. What is the purpose and significance of red ledgers?

      Delete
    4. The implication of debt written in blood.

      Delete
    5. You aren't going to stop speaking in cryptic language and ominous metaphors, are you?

      What has she done, to owe you a debt?

      Delete
    6. No.

      Not me. Others are coming to collect. She has made enemies.

      Delete
    7. I cannot say without crossing a line. Pushing it as it is.

      Delete
    8. So there's a reason you're being vague. There are consequences if you aren't vague. And you're afraid of those consequences. Interesting.

      Delete
    9. Once again living up to your title.

      Delete
    10. Whatever. Maybe.

      You said you were pushing it already. Is issuing a warning considered pushing it?

      Delete
    11. Yes. It is a calculated risk. Saying it is a risk is a risk.

      Delete
    12. Now we're getting somewhere!

      So you didn't have to give this warning. It's a favour. An act of selflessness, dare I say?

      Delete
    13. Guess I'll stop grilling you, then.

      Delete
  4. guess that's something we should've seen coming. You just the messenger?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That implies I was given a message to send.

      Delete
    2. You've been doing that with everything you've typed; don't see why I can't get in on the action.

      Besides, if the debt isn't to you I doubt the threat is from you; there's something else at work here, something that has power over you. Could be anything from something like the Fears to the laws of the universe.
      Either way, you're a messenger.

      Delete
    3. Power is power. The ability to force choices onto other people. Don't see how that's subjective.

      Delete
    4. There are many forms of power, some more subtle than others.

      Delete
  5. If you're sending a warning to her, then that means she's still alive. I didn't believe for one second that she "got out" I just assumed she got brainwashed and killed off, or some shit.

    Good to hear that she is still alive, however, it's not good to hear that she is in danger, questioning you is pointless cause it seems that no matter what you do, you're going to throw cryptic bullshit at us no matter what and I don't do cryptic.

    Guess we're stuck in the back seat on this one.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I hope for your sake that you don't do anything to her.

    Even Bill won't be able to keep him in.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, so it's OK when YOU use words and phrases with ambiguous meanings. But god forbid anyone from returning the favour.

      Yo JP, don't tell Totara anything specific. If we don't get details or even core facts, then he can't have them either.

      Delete
    2. I have reason. What is yours?

      Delete
    3. My reason is that you are being vague - whether you have a reason for that itself is not grounds for reconsideration.

      Delete
    4. Yes, I'm well aware you don't like me. But you claim I have an attention to detail. So of course I'm pendantic.

      Delete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. What the hell is going on? First I'm directed here by someone named 'Jack,' then I find that there's someone cryptic here?

    ReplyDelete